I did not comment on your input on ballistics, nor do I have issue with your choice to enjoy whatever round you do. In fact, I pretty much always enjoyed your participation here. Yes, we will have to agree to disagree on that point. And, I too will stand by my comment on the promoters of those two rounds. And, if you pay attention, you will note that I do not choose to go into either of those encampments and tout a topic which does not savor well there. It would just be in poor taste to do so, knowing how folks feel, and, having knowledge of the history. "When in Rome..." as they say.I gave my reasons from a ballistics standpoint, and I won't change on that. As far as the other comment goes, we'll have to agree to disagree on the .277. I was there for that, and I know all the inside baseball on it, and there's a hell of a lot more to it than just what you've said. I was one of the few who tried to mend fences, but neither side would, so there's plenty of blame to go around on both sides. But I'm not going to get into it beyond that.