6.8 SPC Forums banner
  • Hey Guest, it looks like you haven't made your first post yet. Until you make an introduction thread, the rest of the site is locked to posting. Why not take a few minutes to say hi!
1 - 20 of 21 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
1,509 Posts
Re: Check out ADDAX Tactical's 5.56 SBR/Pistol upper, 6.8 plans.

thats not Adaxs that is PWS's and Adax is a vendor and I think it is bad ass. They are going to have more issues with a 6.8 because of bore and pressure
 

· Registered
Joined
·
204 Posts
ArtFWTx said:
http://www.ar15.com/forums/topic.html?b=3&f=124&t=426466

I spotted this in the "New Products" section on ARFCOM. Hopefully Chris will stop by and tell us more. SBR 6.8 Pistons sometime soon? Sounds like the 5.56 versions are inbound.
Actually that is PWS's new 7" Diablo that they created to address the needs for a 7" Gas Piston Upper.

Addax Tactical is one of the Exclusive Master Dealers for the Diablo. :D
 

· Registered
Joined
·
5,565 Posts
Discussion Starter · #5 ·
It appears well executed. The list of components is impressive. Looks like quality parts all around.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
204 Posts
ArtFWTx said:
It appears well executed. The list of components is impressive. Looks like quality parts all around.
Oh yeah!

I have seen the development of the Diablo from its initial renderings on a CAD Program, through prototype development and the final production version.

I was able to shoot a Diablo Prototype back in September 08 with PWS, it is one kick butt 7" Shorty Gas Piston Upper.

The gas piston system is very unique where it does address gas pressure concerns in such a short platform. :wink:
 

· Registered
Joined
·
1,509 Posts
When I said pressure I was not talking about to much pressure I was speaking of too little pressure for the duration time to fill on a long stroke piston even with the extra back pressure from the comp which I think is very good. The 6.8 gives relief in the peak pressure but at the same time becasue of the shortness of its pressure curve the pressure at the port will not be high end for the such short duration. The larger bore size also plays into this as well because of the relationship with volume thru a given port size compared to the 5.56. You very likely can get one to run but it will still be a challenge to find the correct balance to allow light and heavy bullets to both function.

The other thing I would be looking at is the comp on there which as I said I like: As it has a expansion chamber in there to create necessary back pressure it is very likely that it also decreases (even if ever so slightly)not simply redirects the sound signature of the weapon which the ATF is going to ruin you day about. They will claim it meets the definition of a suppressor. Not saying that it does just that from the looks and the reason for its use makes this a possibility. IMO PWS should CYA, if they have not already handled this, it and have proof of them conducting even informal sound testing. It can be attached to a longer gun that doesn't need it for function to test which would probably be easier. The same thing happened with the first of whats now called "The flaming Pig" (not what they were called or who they were made by then) and the internals had to be removed to be sold without NFA stamps.

I am not trying to be a killjoy. I am VERY IMPRESSED with this upper. I really really like it to the point I am considering buying one. I was very impressed with its perf in the video as well. I think it should be a big seller for you guys and PWS.

BTW I have been looking aorund at your site. It is one of the best laid out and performing web sites I have seen in the firearms industry. The only others close are Victor's and one other I can't recall right now. Very nice. Must have cost some to have it done.unless one of you is a developer. Regardless very very nice.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
204 Posts
Tim_W said:
When I said pressure I was not talking about to much pressure I was speaking of too little pressure for the duration time to fill on a long stroke piston even with the extra back pressure from the comp which I think is very good. The 6.8 gives relief in the peak pressure but at the same time becasue of the shortness of its pressure curve the pressure at the port will not be high end for the such short duration. The larger bore size also plays into this as well because of the relationship with volume thru a given port size compared to the 5.56. You very likely can get one to run but it will still be a challenge to find the correct balance to allow light and heavy bullets to both function.

The other thing I would be looking at is the comp on there which as I said I like: As it has a expansion chamber in there to create necessary back pressure it is very likely that it also decreases (even if ever so slightly)not simply redirects the sound signature of the weapon which the ATF is going to ruin you day about. They will claim it meets the definition of a suppressor. Not saying that it does just that from the looks and the reason for its use makes this a possibility. IMO PWS should CYA, if they have not already handled this, it and have proof of them conducting even informal sound testing. It can be attached to a longer gun that doesn't need it for function to test which would probably be easier. The same thing happened with the first of whats now called "The flaming Pig" (not what they were called or who they were made by then) and the internals had to be removed to be sold without NFA stamps.

I am not trying to be a killjoy. I am VERY IMPRESSED with this upper. I really really like it to the point I am considering buying one. I was very impressed with its perf in the video as well. I think it should be a big seller for you guys and PWS.

BTW I have been looking aorund at your site. It is one of the best laid out and performing web sites I have seen in the firearms industry. The only others close are Victor's and one other I can't recall right now. Very nice. Must have cost some to have it done.unless one of you is a developer. Regardless very very nice.
I totally understand where you are coming from. :wink:

The Comp. design concerns have already been taken care of with ATF.

PWS is already starting to ship the Diablo's out.

You are right about the pressure issues especially when dealing with such a very short barrel/system, and PWS has addressed this, but I do not want to give away their technical secret sauce (so to speak).

They are currently working on a 6.8 version, they are looking to release in the future, when they receive their special order 6.8 barrels and other 6.8 components.

I have only shot the 5.56 version, and the overall design and performance are very impressive, and for a 7" piston driven upper, the accuracy was very impressive.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
204 Posts
Cold said:
Chris,

We need a range report sir!
I have shot the 5.56 version a few times during its development.

PWS has done an outstanding job on addressing the concerns and issues found with 7" short systems. I can tell you that it is one kick butt upper, and accurate to boot.

PWS recently shot 30 - 30 round mags of 5.56 back to back, and not one hick up or stoppage.

I know PWS has shot thousands of rounds in development, and they are working on the 6.8 version as we speak, and they say it will not be an issue with 6.8.

PWS is waiting on some special order 6.8 barrels, and god knows when they will be in, but as soon as they do make the 6.8 version available for purchase, I already have my name on one, and I will provide you guys a range report. :D
 

· Registered
Joined
·
2,858 Posts
this makes it hard to decide what to get now my locale gun dealer is looking for a SIG 556 pistil for me now this is out ...... witch one should i get the SIG pistil is about 2k. but i already have a pistil AR lower
 

· Registered
Joined
·
5,565 Posts
Discussion Starter · #18 ·
dark1 said:
this makes it hard to decide what to get now my locale gun dealer is looking for a SIG 556 pistil for me now this is out ...... witch one should i get the SIG pistil is about 2k. but i already have a pistil AR lower
Well if you have an empty AR pistol lower, you'll need an upper sometime... :lol: :lol:

This PWS Diablo is very cool and looks well thought out. You'll come in a little less than the Sig 556 pistol, so you could put an Aimpoint Micro on the Diablo for the same price as the Sig 556?

For me that would be a tough choice, as I'm a fan of the 556 too. Good luck with your choice, either way you have a wickedly cool pistol. You can always pay $200 and convert either to a SBR also. :twisted:
 

· Registered
Joined
·
204 Posts
I would say go with the Diablo for the following reasons:

1) The Diablo uses an AR Bolt, Bolt Carrier, Charging Handle, Upper Receiver. If you ever need a replacement part, AR parts are going to be much easier to find, and you can change out the bolt, extractor etc. at home. Where was with a SIG, break an extractor or a bolt, and you are sending it back to SIG or to a SIG Authorized Repair Shop, and waiting for them to fix it for you... It happen to me with my SIG556 Swat Rifle. My extractor decided to break, and I had to ship my rifle back to SIG for them to repair it. They would not ship me the extractor.

2) The Diablo will install on AR Lowers.

3) The Diablo is UBER COOL! :D
 

· Registered
Joined
·
1,509 Posts
You forgot that you are also selling it. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

I agree with him I would go with the Diablo if this is about getting the smallest working package. I personally would like to see it worked a bit moro to ensure its rock solid but with the way PWS and ADDAX will stand behind their products it should not be much of an issue. Also all and all the piston part of any of these systems is not rocket science despite what many have said. Its the little things that make the dif. SO if it functions properly from the start and made with quality parts it should continue to. There is far less abuse from a long stroke compared to a short stroke as well as other benefits which is specifically why they used it not a SS :wink: .
 
1 - 20 of 21 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top